On Monday, September 29, 2014 1:38 PM, Timothy Kubal <tkubal@csufresno.edu> wrote:
Post to the blog by sending it to
From: "Pete Rice" <pete13371106@yahoo.com>
To: "Timothy Kubal" <tkubal@csufresno.edu>
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 1:12:41 PM
Subject: Weekly Participation
To: "Timothy Kubal" <tkubal@csufresno.edu>
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 1:12:41 PM
Subject: Weekly Participation
For this week, my partner and I discussed whether or not male circumcision and female genitalia mutilation is considered a human right violation. We both came to the consensus: female mutilation is absolutely a violation, whereas male circumcision can go both ways. The mutilation of female genitalia is meant to be oppressive to women. It is practiced so that women aren't able to enjoy sexual pleasure. This makes the inferior in countries where this takes place. It is exercised to control women. I honestly found it sickening that this act is practiced today. As for males, my partner was more or less against circumcision. Due to the fact that it is typically done at such an early age, this removes any chance for objection on the male's part. There are some advantages to having this done, whereas there aren't any advantages for having a woman's private parts mutilated.
No comments:
Post a Comment